Page Nav

HIDE

Pages

Classic Header

{fbt_classic_header}

Breaking News:

latest

CNN Poll Reveals Landslide Expectation for Trump Win in 2020

To watch CNN’s incessantly negative coverage of President Donald Trump, one would think the president has absolutely no chance whatsoever ...

To watch CNN’s incessantly negative coverage of President Donald Trump, one would think the president has absolutely no chance whatsoever of winning re-election in 2020.
Yet a newly released CNN poll shows that a majority of Americans believe Trump is on track to do exactly that: Win re-election and remain in the White House for another four-year term.
The poll, the results of which were posted Wednesday, was conducted for CNN by independent research company SSRS and queried more than 1,000 respondents between May 28-31 on a host of issues related to Trump.
One question asked respondents to provide their “best guess” as to whether Trump would win re-election or not.
A whopping fifty-four percent of those polled said they believed he would win, while 41 percent said they thought he would lose and 5 percent offered no opinion either way.
That’s a rather remarkable number, and if it were to hold true and translate into actual votes come Election Day in 2020, Trump could win his second term in an electoral “landslide.”
Making that number even more remarkable is the fact that it’s almost a complete reversal from the results obtained by the same polling firm with the same question in December 2018.
At the time, just 43 percent of respondents said they believed Trump would win, and 51 percent said they believed he would lose.
As much consternation as the Trump re-election question likely gave the folks at CNN, they were probably irked even more by the fact that Trump performed better on this question than former President Barack Obama did in May 2011.
Eight years ago, only 50 percent of respondents believed Obama would win, while 44 percent believed he would lose and 6 percent offered no opinion. As we obviously all know, Obama won re-election in 2012.
One probable reason for this stunning result in a CNN poll about Trump’s re-election chances is that, despite the network’s terribly biased coverage of the president, the incredible state of the nation’s economy has managed to override the incessant negativity and constant yapping of talking heads.
Asked to rate the nation’s current economic state, 70 percent of respondents in the CNN poll said the economy was either “very” or “somewhat” good, while only 29 percent rated it as “somewhat” or “very” poor.
It’s worth noting that one would have to go all the way back to the period between 1997 and 2001 to find similar high marks for the state of the economy in this particular poll.
It should also be pointed out that Obama’s high-water mark on this particular question was 53 percent “net good” in September 2016, unless one were to count the 57 percent “net good” mark reached in January 2017, though that was no doubt attributable to the substantial economic boost caused by Trump’s 2016 election.
As for Trump’s impact on the economy, the poll revealed that 52 percent of respondents approved of how he’s been handling it, compared to 41 percent who disapproved.
The Hill summed up the new poll’s results nicely: “The most recent poll shows Trump scoring his highest marks on his handling of the economy, with 52 percent approving and 70 percent saying the economy is in good shape.”
Furthermore, the economy was far and away the top reason cited — 26 percent — by those who said they approved of the president’s overall job performance to explain why they did so.
Only 1 percent of those who disapproved of the president’s overall job performance cited the economy as their main beef.
To be sure, this particular CNN poll doesn’t guarantee Trump’s victory in 2020.
But given the historical strength of incumbent presidents seeking re-election, especially when paired with a strong economy, the odds are most certainly aligned in his favor at the moment.
Indeed, quite a few modelers and predictors — even those who openly admit their distaste for the president — have concluded that Trump’s re-election is far more likely to occur than not, provided things like the economy remain the same or better over the next year and a half.
CNN can talk trash about Trump all day long.
But the numbers don’t lie — a significant majority of the country can clearly see that Trump is winning when it comes to the economy.
And it’s not likely that American voters will decide to ditch a proven winner and change horses mid-stream in 2020 if the economy continues to remain as strong as it is now.

18 comments

  1. I am TREXIT now. Through with DUMP"S betrayals and lies.
    Nominate Assange for the Nobel Peace Prize https://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/2019/04/the-controversial-nobel-peace-prize.html

    The Draft Dodger FOLDS like always:
    Flip Flopping on vaccines now .
    Flynn was charged and pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about whether he discussed sanctions in a telephone call with then-Russian ambassador to the United States Sergey Kislyak, before Trump became president. Such a communication could have been unlawful if it interfered with American foreign policy. So, when Trump learned of the lie, he fired Flynn. Yet in his plea negotiations with Mueller, Flynn revealed why he discussed sanctions with Kislyak -- because the pre-presidential Trump asked him to do so. An honest revelation by Trump could have negated Flynn's prosecution. But the revelation never came.
    https://www.rt.com/usa/456270-trump-on-assanges-arrest/
    US President Donald Trump, who said he loved WikiLeaks during his election campaign, tried to distance himself from the arrest of Julian Assange, which was carried out by Britain on the request of the US.
    Speaking to journalists in the Oval Office on Thursday, hours after the arrest of Assange in London, Trump said:
    "I know nothing about WikiLeaks. It’s not my thing."
    Trump was far less reluctant to speak about the transparency site in 2016, when it played a major role in the US presidential election after it published a number of documents leaked from the Hillary Clinton campaign.
    Then-candidate Trump called the work of the site “amazing” and said he “loved” what it was being doing.
    On the same October day that the “Access Hollywood” tape emerged, revealing that Trump had bragged in 2005 about groping women, WikiLeaks began releasing damaging emails from Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager, John Podesta. Trump and his allies, facing a tough battle in the campaign’s final month, seized on the illegal dumps and weaponized them.
    “WikiLeaks, I love WikiLeaks,” Trump said in Pennsylvania.
    “This WikiLeaks is like a treasure trove,” Trump said in Michigan.
    “Boy, I love reading WikiLeaks,” Trump said in Ohio.
    All told, Trump extolled WikiLeaks more than 100 times, and a poster of Assange hung backstage at the Republican’s debate war room. At no point from a rally stage did Trump express any misgivings about how WikiLeaks obtained the emails from the Clinton campaign or about the accusations of stealing sensitive U.S. government information, which led to the charges against Assange on Thursday.
    When asked about Assange in 2017, Trump said he did not “support or unsupport” WikiLeaks’ move to release hacked emails and that he would not be involved in any decision for the U.S. government to arrest Assange.
    “I am not involved in that decision,” whether or not to arrest Assange, Trump told The Associated Press then, “but if they want to do it, it’s OK with me.”
    That is the SAME betrayal tRUMP pulled with "LOCK HER UP"
    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/11/22/donald-trump-hillary-clinton/94266466/
    Now that he's won the election, the president-elect is sending a signal both to Congress and, perhaps even his incoming attorney general, that it's no longer politically beneficial to try to prosecute the former Democratic presidential nominee. In a Tuesday meeting with editors and reporters at the New York Times, Trump said he doesn’t “want to hurt the Clintons, I really don’t. She went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways.”
    https://www.infowars.com/watch/?video=5ceaf67c9bb386001275567a
    god damn coward

    ReplyDelete
  2. If this is true, you have lost it, America, BIG TIME!

    ReplyDelete
  3. ASSange did nothing for peace,anymore than obama did.

    ReplyDelete
  4. ROFLMAO! 1000 respondents? yeah thats really conclusive. lol dump trump, hes a disaster for the usa.,

    ReplyDelete
  5. so you want to continue with the same old corruption in govt? shes a loser just as they all are. sell their souls for attention. you wasted your money. pathetic.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Who doesn't SA back? I've done my research and even donated to her campaign already. So I'm a backer too!

    ReplyDelete
  7. do some research,or do you just follow msm BS. her backer is sheldon adelson, nuff said.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'd say making 'war crimes by the Obama admin' public did a lot more for peace than anything you might have accomplished Irish... eat a spud!

    ReplyDelete
  9. lol you have accurately named yourself, bazaar cretin. tell us cretinous fool,wtf was accomplished,other than making the attention whore ASSange known? wtf doesn't they pasty faced aussie expose the bush crimes, you know ,9/11? well,because he "gets annoyed' that anyone questions the govt tale. lol you are well named cretin.

    ReplyDelete
  10. nope its bazaar, you so epitomize the weirdo cretin that you named yourself. ASSange is a user, he used wikileaks that was founded by others for whistleblowers.LMA ASSange won't publish anything exposing his employers. never ask wtf he doesn't publish about isn'treal do you. he tells everyone the govt lie is the truth. we all know it was a usa/mossad. false flag. except the bazaar cretins, you.

    ReplyDelete
  11. It's Bezoar not bazaar and you're aptly named Irish. Names aside Assange is a publisher who publishes news that is leaked to him. If you have information on who perpetrated 9/11 and it's legit by all means get it in the hands of Assange and he'll publish that also.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Got somebody better that's running? She want's to end 'regime change' wars and stop the influx of monies to the MIC... how is that 'same old'?

    ReplyDelete
  13. ROFLMAO pandering to the masses. they all are whores of lies.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Gabbard/Paul in 2020! How's that for a 2-party system?

    ReplyDelete
  15. I don’t believe I would let my guard down based on a poll conducted by CNN.

    ReplyDelete