Page Nav

HIDE

Pages

Classic Header

{fbt_classic_header}

Breaking News:

latest

New York Times Takes Omar's Side On 9/11, Hides Terrorist Connection

The  New York Times , one of the main propaganda machines for the  Democrat Party , issued a tweet for the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks...

The New York Times, one of the main propaganda machines for the Democrat Party, issued a tweet for the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks that it deleted.
It is a wise idea to issue reminders of the tragic day in American history but The Times caption was as ridiculous as Rep. Ilhan Omar’s response to the attacks.
“18 years have passed since airplanes took aim and brought down the World Trade Center. Today, families will once again gather and grieve at the site where more than 2000 people died,” it said.
The Times was attacked for the tweet. “Airplanes took aim” is as ridiculous as Rep. Omar’s “ Some people did something.”



See #MinshawHive🤑🥃🍕⚾️🏈's other Tweets
Once again The NY Times reveals its bias. The planes did NOT take aim. The evil hate filled men flying the planes took aim. This is the same stupidity in gun control proponents thinking. https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1171735444620492802 
See Realist & Curmudgeon's other Tweets
"Airplanes took aim"

This is the most influential newspaper in the world.

Attn @nytimes : Airplanes have no agency, free will, or capacity for independent action. They are just machines.

Radical Islamic terrorists took down the WTC. https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1171735444620492802 
See Fauxmaha's other Tweets
No. 18 years have passed since terrorists took aim and brought down the World Trade Center.

Airplanes were just their chosen weapon, the terrorist did the aiming. Why is this stuff so hard? 🤨 https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1171735444620492802 
See Persnickety's other Tweets
Airplanes take aim...guns cause mass shootings.....I think I've finally figured it out. The problem with the media today is that they live in the world from The Brave Little Toaster. https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1171735444620492802 
See Dave's Not Here's other Tweets
Imagine a story in 1959 beginning: "18 years have passed since airplanes took aim and brought down the U.S. fleet at Pearl Harbor..." https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1171735444620492802 
29 people are talking about this
For a paper that thinks it’s qualified to rewrite American history, the NY Slimes doesn’t have much grasp on recent history. Twin Towers NOT brought down because “airplanes took aim” at them, but b/c radical Islamists hijacked planes & took aim at them.https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/341686/ 
1,573 people are talking about this
“Airplanes took aim”

“2000 people”

Imagine what it takes, as a newsroom with a huge editorial process, to get 9/11 so offensively incorrect.

Scumbags.
View image on TwitterView image on Twitter
1,747 people are talking about this
Airplanes took aim
Airplanes took aim
Airplanes took aim
Airplanes took aim
Airplanes took aim
View image on Twitter
308 people are talking about this

“Airplanes took aim”

Wonder if Islamic Extremists had anything to do with it?

The @nytimes is the worst. The absolute worst
View image on Twitter
15 people are talking about this

No comments