“Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied, [and In This Case It’s] a Probable Death Sentence” – Dissenting Wisconsin Supreme Court Judges After Majority Refuses Man Ivermectin

  The Wisconsin Supreme Court refuses to allow a family to provide Ivermectin to their dying relative in a hospital with COVID pneumonia.   ...

 

The Wisconsin Supreme Court refuses to allow a family to provide Ivermectin to their dying relative in a hospital with COVID pneumonia. 

We’ve reported on the Wisconsin Supreme Court before after the 2020 Election when they refused to address concerns that the state allowed ballot drop boxes which were unconstitutional according to the state’s laws and regulations.  We saw one judge outrageously label President Trump as a conservative’s ‘king’.

We know another judge was backed with evil George Soros money.

With judges like these, it’s no wonder the state of Wisconsin’s Supreme Court ends up with insane and anti-American judgments.  And that’s what we have again this past week.  The three liberal judges were joined again by the man who claimed he was a conservative when running but whose verdicts have been anything but.

Karen Mueller at the Amos Center for Justice and Liberty writes:

The Amos Center for Justice & Liberty announces the decisions of the Wisconsin Supreme Court from October 21, 2021 and then again on October 25, 2021 which together denied John Zingsheim, the father of two young adults who lost their mother a year ago, the chance to try to recover from the ravages of lung inflammation caused by Covid-19 pneumonia. The opinions of the Wisconsin Supreme Court were 4 to 3 decisions and in both cases with scathing dissents towards the actions of not only the Court of Appeals members but also towards fellow Supreme Court Justices by Justice Rebecca Bradley when she wrote the following, with Chief Justice Annette Ziegler and Justice Patience Roggensack joining:

“Wisconsin judges are rarely asked to make life-or-death decisions. This case presents one of those rare circumstances. The circuit court made a decision on the side of life. The appellate courts chose the irrevocable and irreversible alternative. But nothing in the law compelled it.”

In the October 21 decision, Judge Bradley was joined with Judges Ziegler and Roggensack in the following statement:

In the October 25 decision, Judge Bradley again dissented and again shared on the utter seriousness of the decision:

Between Soros-backed judges and liberal judges, Mr. Zingsheim doesn’t have a chance.