Page Nav

HIDE

Pages

Classic Header

{fbt_classic_header}

Breaking News:

latest

Pro-Gun Man Stands Up to Pelosi with Fiery Public Statement Every American Needs To Hear

Barely two months into their tenure as the majority in the House of Representatives, Democrats are already pushing their anti-Second Amen...

Barely two months into their tenure as the majority in the House of Representatives, Democrats are already pushing their anti-Second Amendment agenda with a number of strict gun control bills that would impose limitations and restrictions on the fundamental right of citizens to keep and bear arms.
Chief among those gun control bills are HR 8, a universal background checks bill that would essentially outlaw private sales and transfers of firearms, and HR 1112, which would expand the length of time allowed for the background check system to make a determination on a potential purchaser to 10 business days.
Prior to the House voting on HR 8 — it was approved Wednesday — a number of pro-gun Republican lawmakers held a rally outside the Capitol in defense of the Second Amendment.
One of the speakers was Mark Keith Robinson, a gun owner from North Carolina, and he delivered a fiery speech in which he vowed to fight the Democrats — led by Speaker Nancy Pelosi — who are incessantly trying to chip away at his cherished right of gun ownership.
Robinson began by recalling how in April 2018 he had addressed the City Council of his hometown of Greensboro about a similar piece of legislation that would expand background checks and infringe upon gun rights of law-abiding citizens.



“They were doing much the same as what some of the members of this Congress are trying to do now. They are trying to infringe on my constitutional right to own a firearm,” Robinson said. “And I’m here today to say the same thing that I said to that City Council — I do not intend to let it pass without me speaking up.
“I am absolutely tired, as most law-abiding gun owners are, of having our rights doled out to us and taken away from us in small parcels. It is high time that our rights are as protected as the criminals’ rights.”
Robinson asked, “Why is it that the criminals don’t have to go to the sheriff and ask for permission to defend themselves in court for the crimes they’ve committed, but I have to go to the sheriff or the FBI to ask for the right to defend myself from criminals?
“It’s absolutely egregious. Our Constitution gives us an absolute right to defend ourselves with firearms, and it should be uninfringed.”
Robinson said he was standing against HR 8 and HR 1112 “because (the Democrats) are doing exactly what gun owners in this country have been saying for years — taking our rights away from us one small parcel at a time, and it needs to stop.”
He turned and expressed his gratitude to the politicians who were standing behind him in the fight to protect the Second Amendment, and encouraged them to continue fighting, prior to issuing a stern warning to those who are attempting to infringe upon his rights.
“To the politicians who support these laws, from those who are the hardcore socialists who plan on trying to dismantle our Constitution to simply the lazy, ineffective politicians that are holding our rights as political hostage for expedience to advance their own careers, I say this,” Robinson said. “Gun owners in this country, law-abiding citizens in this country, we’re no longer going to be silent. We are no longer asleep. We are wide awake. We are wide aware.
“And we are going to do everything we can to make sure that if you’re trying to take our constitutional rights. We are going to get you out of these halls and replace you with people that will” protect those rights.
Following Robinson’s fiery and on-point speech in defense of gun rights, House Minority Whip Steve Scalise — who was the target of a politically motivated mass shooting — spoke of the prevalence of firearms that are used by good people to defend themselves and others, and noted how Democrats had blocked him from testifying at a House committee hearing on gun violence because he refused to tout the gun control agenda.
While expanded background checks might not sound like a big deal to some people, the importance of opposing such measures was pointed out by Robinson in that Democrats are constantly working to chip away at Americans’ gun rights and must be confronted and stopped at each turn.
Thank God there are people like Robinson who are willing to speak out against those who would attempt to undermine our fundamental right to keep and bear arms for our own defense, as that right is essentially the one thing that upholds and supports all of the other rights and freedoms and liberties that we hold dear.

10 comments

  1. I can only say two things. I wish I had been present to loudly voice my support for Mr. Robinson and I would have loved to get a picture of Nancy Pelosie's face as he told her his feelings on the matter. I know she would have cracked her face to give him that same "SH!T EATING" smile she always puts on but I would bet it was not hard to tell it was more fake than ever.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What type of person would attack and infringe on our Rights granted by Creator?

    ReplyDelete
  3. How about RED FLAG laws on Politicians? Simply DEMAND they do the exact same thing-PLUS.
    Politicians, Police, Judges, Government Workers make Life & Death deadly decisions every day.
    Public Servants are also expected to be held to Higher Standards due to their positions and maintaining the Public Trust.
    Therefore when they come out with such demands of their EMPLOYERS, their EMPLOYERS have the Right and Duty to make the same demand of THEM.
    WE demand THEY provide ALL their social media and computer searches, their e-mail accounts, Bank accounts and financial records for examination. Also Mental Screening, physical records, testing for steroids and illicit drugs. They must also wear GPS trackers so we can evaluate where they are spending their time. Screening for pedophilia and any other sickness.
    If it is good enough for US it is certainly good enough for Our EMPLOYEES.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Your Sworn Enemy. Who does not respect you or your Nature given instinctive right to protect yourself
    or family, Who does not care if you and yours die. Remember that for the rest of your life .
    Share with all, http://batr.org/utopia/090418.html
    And , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bOJiTskr6w.

    ReplyDelete
  5. He will be destroyed by the politicians.

    ReplyDelete
  6. To late, They were given the power to rule over you and you will never ever get it back.
    Please enjoy your servitude.
    He who does not Respect your right to protection of your life and family is your Enemy.
    What more do you need to know ?

    ReplyDelete
  7. That which is given may be taken away.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that "Where rights (liberty) secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no legislation which would abrogate (abolish) them." (Miranda v Arizona) What’s that mean? Well, it means that in order to lawfully effect a Right/Liberty protected by our Constitution (nullify it, limit it, license it or restrict it) the powers that be (state or federal) are required to comply with the Constitution’s Article V Amendment process before they expediently make an end-run around our Constitution to take away (or “infringe” upon) your Right of self defense protected by the Second Amendment.

    A few elected bozos and the stroke of an executive’s pen doesn’t cut it my friends. Telling you they have the “authority” to by-pass the Constitution by passing some goofy law because ‘they’ voted on it is what’s known as acting under “the color of law.” The color of law is defined as the actions of an ‘official’, be it law enforcement or legislative, purported to be in the conduct of their official duties when, in fact, they have no lawful authority to actually ‘act’ or conduct themselves. An example might be law enforcement making arrests of peaceful protestors or phony traffic arrests in order to raise revenue. Another example would be a legislature passing laws effecting areas where they have no lawful authority to legislate.

    “Shall not be infringed” means that if they want to “infringe” and expand the government’s authority to nullify, limit, license or restrict that doesn’t exist, they must go through the Article V Amendment process in order to ‘acquire’ the lawful authority to legislate limits, licenses or to nullify your Rights. If they have no authority to pass such a law or ordinance (haven’t complied with the the lawful Amendment process) then the aforementioned Supreme Court stated in Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham Alabama that the individuals should “engage in the right (liberty) with impunity.” Without said lawful Amendment the Supreme Court’s Marbury vs Madison comes into play: "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void."

    If the Supreme Court’s declarations mean nothing, Hamilton made clear in Federalist 78 that “No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid.” Jefferson said much the same thing in 1798 when he said “Whenever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void and of no force.” The Supremacy Clause (Article 6 clause 2) codifies this very principle; that any law made by Congress that is not made in pursuance to the Constitution, is no law at all.

    If politicians, judges and law enforcement don’t care to comply with our Constitution (the ‘highest’ law of the land) which they’ve sworn an Oath to, then the People shouldn’t worry about complying with their ‘gun laws’.

    https://resistancetononsense.wordpress.com/2018/06/29/our-preexisting-irrevolkable-right-of-self-defense/

    ReplyDelete
  9. Mr. Robinson should run for office himself. Few people have been as eloquent and passionate about the subject in public as he has been. Given the chance, I would gladly vote for him.

    ReplyDelete