Page Nav

HIDE

Pages

Classic Header

{fbt_classic_header}

Breaking News:

latest

Not 'All Americans' Are 'Proud That We Have More Women In The Workforce Than Ever Before'

PRAGER: Not 'All Americans' Are 'Proud That We Have More Women In The Workforce Than Ever Before' In his State of the ...

PRAGER: Not 'All Americans' Are 'Proud That We Have More Women In The Workforce Than Ever Before'


In his State of the Union address, President Trump announced, "All Americans can be proud that we have more women in the workforce than ever before." It was one of the few times he received a standing ovation from both Democrats and Republicans.

I would not have stood and cheered.
Either the president or whoever wrote that line honestly thought it was something worth celebrating, or the president simply wanted to say something that would sound wonderful to both Democrats and Republicans, as well as to Americans who do not otherwise support him.
Whatever the reason, both the fact that there are more women in the workforce than ever before and the fact that Trump thought mentioning it would bring credit to his administration constitute a victory for the feminist left. Getting women to leave home for the workplace has been one of the central goals of modern feminism.
Feminists deny this, claiming they don't prefer women work outside the home; they only want women to have the choice to do so. But if that were true, why did congressional Democrats — the women in white, feminists all — jump up and cheer?
The answer is obvious: Feminists consider women who eschew a career to take care of their home, their children and their husband to be less than women who place career first.
But even if one prefers that women work outside of the home, "All Americans can be proud that we have more women in the workforce than ever before" is simply not true. As feminists often note, many women work outside of the home not because they want to but because they have no choice: They have to support themselves, their household and/or their children.
Why should we be proud of that?
What if every woman in America were in the workforce? Would we be proud of that? By the "more of women than ever" logic, we should be.
On the other hand, if the president had said, "All Americans can be proud of the fact that more women than ever now have the choice to work inside or outside the home," that would be true. That is something I, too, would have cheered.
But the members of Congress did not stand and cheer because more women have the choice to work outside the home. They cheered because more women than ever before are working outside the home.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2017, nearly 75 million women were in the American civil workforce. But it is inconceivable that 75 million women want to be in the workforce. So, again, why all the cheering?
We know why Democrats did: They want women to eschew homemaking and time with children in favor of work outside the house.
But why did Republicans stand up and cheer?
One reason bears testimony to the thesis of a recent column I wrote: The greatest fear in America is fear of the left. The last thing Republican members of Congress wanted was to be photographed sitting quietly after the president of the United States announced, "All Americans can be proud that we have more women in the workforce than ever before"— especially while every Democrat was standing and cheering. The left-wing media, meaning virtually all mainstream media, would have depicted every such Republican "sexist" and "misogynist."
A second reason bears testimony to another fact of contemporary life: Republicans have been far more influenced by leftism than Democrats have been by conservatism. While many of the Republicans who cheered did so out of fear of the left and/or to support their party's beleaguered president, many sincerely believe the record number of women in the workplace is something worth celebrating.
But believe it or not, there are still many women and men who do not agree. We all acknowledge that with enough money and/or familial support, a woman can raise fine children and maintain a happy home and a loving marriage. Nevertheless, we also know that doing all three is difficult enough when a woman devotes full time to those three goals. But when a woman works outside the home, devoting full time to home and family is impossible.
So, yes, more women than ever are in the workplace. But before we stand and cheer, it is worth asking:
Are women happier today?
Are families doing better today?
Are marriages happier with wives at home or in the workplace?
Do young people grow up happier and better-adjusted with mothers at home or with mothers in the workplace?
Is society's emphasis on work and career inhibiting more young women from marrying and having children?
Is society better off or worse off when a record number of women leave home to enter the workplace?
Only when those questions are answered will we know whether to cheer.
Dennis Prager is a nationally syndicated radio talk-show host and columnist. His latest book, published by Regnery in April 2018, is "The Rational Bible," a commentary on the book of Exodus. He is the founder of Prager University and may be contacted at dennisprager.com.

6 comments

  1. I washed my hands of Trump when he moved the Emabssy wasting $22MILLION(at least) that we cannot afford.
    STUPID Americans. The PTB make both Parents work so TPTB can TAX both and suppress wages. Now you can't afford children and are too overburdened to have that JOY. So TPTB want to flood you with alien cultures that are based on subservience to TPTB so they can end your inconvenient Freedom.
    Back around WWI the 1% figured out that if they could get women out of the homes and into the factories they could suppress wages, and make more money by doubling the labor pool ....... PRESTO "feminism" was born .............. Communism is an oppressive Jewish concept. The Rockefellers claimed they got women to work to make them pay taxes but it also takes power from the Men who are the main concern of the states control..
    The people behind the progressive feminist movement have all-but destroyed the normal family unit (Rothchild, Rockefeller and his elite pals wanted to put women to work so they could tax both adults in the household, but on top of that, working women are less likely to reproduce than stay-at-home-moms
    The feminazi movement is just part of the Jew Marx Agenda to destroy the family unit.....Two famous jew Commies.....Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem..... don't stay home and raise the kids.....go out and work instead.... coupled with Helen Gurley Brown and her push for all women to be sluts articles in her magazine!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. also the same communist jews who ruined the mostly white families now tell us we need brown/black peasants having kids to save us

    ReplyDelete
  3. cheaper,but the set aside jobs at the sewer plants go to white men wonder why.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9ee25dbe92157460ef8d4906c5039b78c2690493fb84013192c87e0376dedfdf.png

    ReplyDelete
  4. Jews are the enemy within all nations. Anti Christ Jews can only destroy with lies and murder.

    ReplyDelete
  5. yes I agree 100% but those countries you mentioned are not controlled by jews and that is why they are in the crosshairs for destruction. those "americans" got caught in Iran were jew spies

    ReplyDelete
  6. maybe it pays better than in Syria.

    ReplyDelete