New York Times and Washington Post 2018 Pulitzer Prize winners for their garbage Trump-Russia collusion hoax — From left: Maggie Haberma...
New York Times and Washington Post 2018 Pulitzer Prize winners for their garbage Trump-Russia collusion hoax — From left: Maggie Haberman, Jo Becker, Matt Apuzzo, Rosalind Helderman, Tom Hamburger, Ellen Nakashima, Adam Entous, Greg Miller and Mark Mazetti accept the 2018 Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting from Columbia University.
In July 2020 documents were released by the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding the Russia collusion hoax.
The second set of documents exposed the outlandish New York Times story that the Trump team had “repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials.” The declassified documents reveal The New York Times reporting was transparently dishonest and attempted to fuel the Russiagate narrative in its early stages.
Earlier this year in May, the country learned that it was Hillary Clinton’s campaign that was behind the entire Trump-Russia collusion hoax. We know this because her former campaign manager Robbie Mook said so under oath during the Sussman trial.
The entire Trump-Russia collusion narrative was a lie. The Democrats and media knew it was a lie. We now know that the Hillary Clinton Campaign was behind the entire narrative. Democrats used this in their attempted coup of the sitting president. They jailed and bankrupted innocent men in their coup attempt.
The New York Times along with the Washington Post later won Pulitzer Prizes for their junk Trump-Russia collusion reporting that was later confirmed to be factually inaccurate and a complete fraud.
If these outlets had any integrity they’d return their phony prizes.
Hillary Clinton-linked Perkins Coie lawyer Michael Sussmann was indicted for lying to the FBI about not representing “any client” when he acted as a running dog for Hillary. Sussman tipped off the bureau about the Trump Organization secretly communicating with Russian Alfa Bank.
According to a debunked story published by far-left Slate, Trump set up a secret server at Trump Tower on 5th Avenue to “communicate privately with a Putin-tied Russian bank called Alfa Bank.”
The FBI began investigating the Trump Organization’s “back-channel” with the Russian-owned bank after Sussmann ran to the FBI and presented data files to back up the claims.
It was all a lie and Hillary hatched the lie and then later promoted the lie.
And The New York Times and Washington Post acted as lapdogs for the left in promoting the fake news for 4 years as a coup against President Trump. They wanted Trump gone. They would push any lie to make it happen.
President Trump called out the Pulitzer Committee back in November and told them to rescind their fraudulent awards.
The Trump Organization threatened a lawsuit against the Pulitzer Committee and demanded the organization revoke the 2018 journalism award from the Washington Post and New York Times.
The Trump Organization also demanded the Pulitzer Committee correct their bogus reports that are still posted on their website.
Earlier this week The Pulitzer Committee announced that they stand by the garbage reporting of The New York Times and Washington Post. They like the lies and will not rescind the awards.
President Trump spoke out against this outrageous development with FOX News digital.
The Daily Mail reported, via Midnight Rider Channel:
The award committee said that it had commissioned two separate and independent investigations of the two newspapers’ coverage of the so-called Russiagate scandal at his behest and found that the reporting was solid.
Trump told Fox News Digital over the phone on Monday that he was not satisfied by the board’s conclusion.
‘Instead of acting with integrity and providing transparency, the Pulitzer Board is running cover for the biggest reporting failure in modern history: the fake Russia Russia Russia collusion hoax. Why would The Washington Post or The New York Times ever want to admit their obvious mistakes and come clean when their false reporting is being guarded, and awarded, by the Pulitzer Prize, which at one point actually meant something?
‘These outlets should hand back their prizes without notification from Pulitzer, which would be the honorable thing to do,’ the former president said. ‘The only way The New York Times and The Washington Post should get a possible Pulitzer Prize would be in a new category—disinformation, for helping to perpetrate a false story created and peddled by Crooked Hillary Clinton, the DNC, and certain lowlife Democrats.’
No comments