We have a feeling that we could do a post on everything that Sean McElwee publishes, but we’re still astounded that anyone publishes Sean ...
We have a feeling that we could do a post on everything that Sean McElwee publishes, but we’re still astounded that anyone publishes Sean McElwee.
When Philip Klein explained in a Washington Examiner piece that implementing the Green New Deal would require a revolution — as in, a literal revolution toppling the existing structure of the U.S. government and abolishing the Senate — McElwee was there for it.
So it’s interesting to see him argue in the New York Times that the Green New Deal isn’t as toxic as President Trumps says — although it was toxic enough that not one Democratic senator voted for it Tuesday.
.@SeanMcElwee: Is the Green New Deal really as toxic as President Trump and Mitch McConnell think it is? My research suggests that it’s not. https://nyti.ms/2FDf1UA
130 people are talking about this
“Republicans may come to regret their mockery.” And speaking of mockery, here’s some well-placed mockery:
[approaches women]
my research says i am a perfect mate
See Joe Gabriel Simonson's other Tweets
can i change my display name to sean mcelwee's research assistant
See Joe Gabriel Simonson's other Tweets
[extremely not a huckster on the make voice]
See Luke Thompson's other Tweets
Excuse me friend, have you heard the good news about muh research?
See Luke Thompson's other Tweets
Look up "research" in a dictionary, and then have an adult explain to you what you find there. It doesn't mean what you think it does.
See GrampyRick's other Tweets
My “research” also shows that pink unicorns fly the fastest.
See Minnesota PitchFork's other Tweets
My research suggests that people have no clue what's in the #GreenNewDeal or understand the cost.
See Lee C Eldridge's other Tweets
“Research” from a Chief Meme Officer...
See Mark Soto's other Tweets
Out of curiosity, is this the same amount of research that went into the muh Russia conspiracy for 2 years?
See The Llama Trainer's other Tweets
Then your research is probably skewed by your personal feelings on the matter. Because the GND is inarguably toxic.
See Moose7195's other Tweets
Um, according to the article, you did polls where you asked people about all the good stuff the GND promised without any of the downsides (skyrocketing energy costs, higher taxes, reduced mobility) and you said this "research" proves people like it. 1/2
See Victor Tango Kilo's other Tweets
It's like you asked people "How would you feel about eating all the chocolate you want without getting fat?"
See Victor Tango Kilo's other Tweets
Lmao. Why don’t you publish Alex Jones next.
See steve wolf 's other Tweets
Well, everyone knows Custer died at Little Bighorn. What this book presupposes is... maybe he didn't.
38 people are talking about this
My confidence that climate change is real: 80%
My confidence that the Green New Deal will make us worse off: 99.99999%
See Checkmate the State's other Tweets
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
See David Satanas's other Tweets
And *still* no Democrats in the Senate voted for it. Hmmm.
See Jay Dubb's other Tweets
Democrats wouldn't even vote for it!
See harrison bergeron's other Tweets
NARRATOR: LOL
Not one co-sponsor of the legislation voted in favor of it.
Your research is hot garb.
See RBe's other Tweets
Seriously, though, really worried the Dems will listen to Sean. Suuuuuuper afraid of that. Definitely.
See Luke Thompson's other Tweets
Seriously nyt, sean mcelwee, this guy is dumb as hell.
See media PitchBot's other Tweets
A progressive operative whose job is to shape data insights to make things look bad or good, depending on the partisan polarity of the issue, says the Green New Deal is super-spiffy popular and Dems should plow forward. So why didn't they vote for it?
See Bryan S. Myrick's other Tweets
No comments